Setiausaha Agung KEADILAN, Datuk Saifuddin Nasution Ismail mempertahan laporan audit KEADILAN berhubung daftar pengundi di Selangor yang didakwa sebagai penipuan oleh Pengerusi Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR), Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof.
Memetik laman The Malaysian Insider, Saifuddin berkata, beliau berdiri teguh dengan audit tersebut dan ia bukan sekadar untuk menafikan laporan SPR.
Sebaliknya, beliau menyifatkan Abdul Aziz sebagai ‘penipu besar’ kerana memberi fakta salah berhubung daftar pengundi negeri itu.
Dalam sidang media semalam, Abdul Aziz menuduh kononnya ada unsur penipuan dalam audit daftar pemilih yang dijalankan KEADILAN di Selangor.
Abdul Aziz juga mendakwa pondok yang dijadikan alamat kepada 13 pengundi seperti yang dinyatakan laporan audit itu adalah tempat letak motosikal penduduk berhampiran.
Saifuddin turut menafikan dakwaan itu dengan mengatakan gambar yang ditunjukkan Abdul Aziz bukan diambil daripada beliau, sebaliknya dari iPad Abdul Aziz sendiri.
“Dalam hal ini, saya boleh katakan dia penipu besar.
“Saya akan pastikan bahawa alamat itu adalah pondok dan bukan tempat letak motosikal,” katanya lagi seperti dipetik.
Menurut laman berita itu, statistik terbaru SPR menunjukkan jumlah pengundi berdaftar seramai 13,052,374 orang, dan 274,247 daripadanya adalah pengundi tidak hadir iaitu tentera, polis dan pengundi luar negara.
Menurutnya lagi, Selangor mempunyai pengundi luar negeri tertinggi iaitu 597 orang dan Kuala Lumpur pula mempunyai jumlah pengundi tidak hadir tertinggi iaitu 40,543 orang.
-GB
Monday, September 24, 2012
Siapa Tipu, PKR atau SPR?
About sabahdaily
SPR adalah instrumen kerajaan kalau mengatakan dia adil sukar dipercayai ianya tangan2 yang halus untuk membohongi parti pembangkang/rakyat untuk meneruskan kuasa...
ReplyDeleteSPR BIKIN PANAS NAK TIPU PUN BIARLAH PRO INI MACAM MEREPEK TAIK KUCING.
ReplyDeleteapa mau hairan klu pondok polis pun tersenarai sbg pengundi dlm daftar pemilih SPR???
ReplyDeleteSPR tu Suruhanjaya Penipu Rakyat. Dah 500 000 pengundi baru tlh wujud dSelangor bgmerampas Selangor sama spt TGanu drampas dr PAS pd PRU ke 12 dulu. Kita ndak kesah jika jatuhnya BN hasil dr kesedaran rakyat Malaysia, tapi masalah utama ialah BERTAMBAH lg warga asing yg dapat ic segera dan dah jadi warga negara Malaysia lagi. Kemngkinan Datuk Seri aseh Che Mat dulu pun brsekongkol menjual kedaulatan negara semasa beliau jadi KSU KDN ke dulu. Nasib baik dah pencen kawan tu,kalu ndak takut hancur lagi negara.
ReplyDeleteBersatu kita rayat Malaysia mempertahankan negara dari PTI berlesen undi,ayo kita jatuhkan ini BN/UMNO penderhaka kepada negara dan rayat.PR for all.
ReplyDeletePKR tipu! SPRM staf krj aja. PKR tambirang! PKR cakap aja mampu buat itu, buat ini. bila ndak mampu, bawa isu2 panas.. masalah tetap ndak settle! asyik risau & bangkitkan marah orang aja. PKR memang panipu!!
ReplyDelete*di dlm SPRM ada ahli UMNO, PAS, PKR, PCM.. biasalah, staf krj dlm negara demokrasi! huhu.
macam di Tanjung Malim juga lah. mengapa PR menang besar di situ? ramai staf proton anti krj BN, tapi bila PR memarintah negeri Perak.. PR kutuk Perdana V6 keluaran Proton. ndak mau V6 kami, hingga staf Proton ramai terdiam, bha.. ramai yg berenti kerja bila kereta ndak dibeli sudah. PKR memang panipu. tambirang jak
*bekas staf proton yg kembali ke felda umas.
Kalau benar SPR menipu, bagaimana PR boleh menang besar di 5 negeri dan hampir2 merampas Putrajaya dari BN? cuba jawab dulu penyokong PR???
ReplyDeleteKalau siapa yang menipu pastikan anda perbetulkan keadaan.
ReplyDeletePenipuan akan merosakkan nama dan imej, oleh itu jangan la menipu.
ReplyDeleteKalau menipu pasti akan diketahui di masa hadapan.
ReplyDeleteBodoh punya KUMPAU. Hidup kita mesti baca tipu muslihat lawan. Jgn hanya nampak 'muka ada senyum' kita pun brbaik sangka dgn ANU SI ANU pada hal selepa s trsenyum itu la, kita akan dtumbuk secara jarak dekat. Awas tumbokkan jarak dekat kesannya ndak sama dgn jarak jauh. Begitu juga brpolitik, kita mesti ada APPRECIATION agar ndak trtipu oleh lawan yg kita kata ..MANA BOLEH DIA TIPU KITA, SEMALAM KAN KITA DAH MENANG BRTUMBOK DGN NYA. Hah bagituh jugak dgn ini SPR atau agensi karjaan yg ada,bah. harus siapsiaga dan bole baca muslihat pehak lawan.
ReplyDeleteADA FAHAMM KAA..KAWAN !
jangan cover2 la isu di selangor.. janji air percuma macam mana?
ReplyDeleteAir Selangor Bn sabotaj guna Syabas kroni BN palau,teruk juga nama kau nie KUMPAU HEHEHE SPESIS umno NAMA PUN HAEHEHEH
ReplyDeleteAku tinggal dPutrajaya...dlm bil air aku ada trtera caj dipotong utk beberapa meter padu yg pertama. So,baru aku tau dPutrajaya pun kerajaan PR Selangor, cover jugak. TABIK SPRING aku.
ReplyDelete**yassir arafat
Dulu aku nak pakai proton perdana V6,nasib baik tak jadi. Bukan ada kualiti pun produk Malaysia. Bukan tak patriotik tapi sebelum nyakitkan hati...lebih baik beli kereta Eropah. Puahati dan mata pun mnjeling.
ReplyDelete**Raja sulu'
Cuba pengerusi SPR itu kawan PKR. Pasti tidak akan adap perkara sebegini. Pasti akan menyokong apa yang SPR lakukan.
ReplyDeleteApa pun kita harap SPR akan memastikan PRU13 ini akan diadakan dengan lancar, baik dan adil kepada semua.
ReplyDeleteKita nak kembalikan SPR kpd fungsi asal demi perjalanan pilihanraya adil , dterima semua pihak. Yg saorg tu barcakkap kalau SPR kawan dangan PKR, mesti tiada lagih komplen, bah. Bangsat punya otak. Jgn mau spin matlamat sabenar,bah. Pilihanraya Bersih dan adil. Maknanya jugak kamurang suka lah kalu SPR dan tak betul lagih. SPR kana bebas batul2 baru adil,bah. Ini ndak, tipu lagi bagi manang sama ituh BN yg suda tipu orang ramai.
ReplyDeleteAdakah SPR sudah laksanakan saranan PSC sebelum ini?
ReplyDeleteTipu menipu adalah taktik kotor.
ReplyDeleteSPR dan JPN adalah dua agensi barua UBN yg menjual kedaulatan negara kpd warga asing. JPN tukang keluarkan ic palsu kepada warga asing dan SPR tukang jadikan mereka pengundi brdaftar. Ayuh bangsa melayu, bangkit la menentang kebejatan UMNO/BN ini.
ReplyDeleteSPR : SRUHANJAYA PENIPU RAKYAT
JPN : JAB.PENJUAL NEGARA
**Bokeh UMNO Sri Monanti
SPR kawan syaitan/Umno,so peragai syaitan amat jijik penipunya.
ReplyDeleteAku trkejut mendengar SPR kini menambah petugas mereka sehingga melebihi 100 000 org. Yg pasti petugas itu akan membuang undi mereka melalui undi pos. Langkah awal SPR kearah 'keadilan' SPR kpd BN. Apa alasan memerlukan petugas sehngga sramai itu. Pertambahan pengundi. Itu tipu semua. Kan petugas itu dlantik kktgn pejabat daerah trbabit. Rakyat tidak membantah andai keperluan tugas memang dperlukan,tetapi jgn ambil kesempatan spt 'sambil menyelam minum air'. Atau petugas itu boleh mengundi pada hari yg sama cuma meeka itu ddahulukan. Apa masalahnya ? Org cipta kapal angkasa lagikan boleh, takkan nak suroh petugas SPR buang undi awal pagi sebelum pengundi biasa mengundi selepas itu, tak boleh buat/
ReplyDeleteHah...JPN tu Jab.Penjual Negara. Biar betul,bah. Tapi ADUN kg aku tu namanya MUIS PICHO memang asal dr Indon. Masyarakat dkg Pasir Puteh Tawau dketuai oleh JKKK warga Indo. Banyak juga la projek majlis yg dia pegang sandirih utk dkasi pd keluarga mereka dr Indon tu. MUIS PICHO itu pegang kad pengenalan projek dan serah semula kad itu utk balik Indon. Lama selepas tu dia dtg semula, tau2 suda jd YB Sebatik. Cilakak punya BN, gadai kg aku pd PATI. Apa kita mau buat,sila kan tapi aku ndak suka negerih ini kasi serah sama itu PTI. Mana Pamuda UMNO Sabah?
ReplyDeletekena kaji balik fakta itu dan pastikan ia benar.
ReplyDeleteorang BN memang bangang sial babi kedaun lahnat 100000000 keturunan...xaxaxaxxaxaxa name UMNO pon dari org putih...bodoh nyerrr umno,,,,,,
ReplyDeletecuba lah tengok di Youtube,pengundi di SK Pekan Keningau,tukang buat rumah saya pun pegi mengundi,saya ada tanya siapa yang bagi IC dia cakap itu kerajaan lah.tapi sekarang dia cakap di tidak mahu undi lagi itu BN sebab selepas mengundi dia mabil balik itu IC..bah jaga-jaga lah BN..itu PTI sudah pandai berfikir lah apa lagi kita rakyaat sabah....
ReplyDeletePKR la yang penipu.. janji mahu bagi air percuma tapi tidak ada pun.. sekarang sibuk mau divert attention pula..
ReplyDeletekalau betul menipu, buat la laporan polis.. terus saman berjuta2..
ReplyDeleteThe public must be careful when encountering criticisms against government institutions that may be false or lack sufficient evidence, Perak Crown Prince Raja Dr Nazrin Shah said today.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete“The challenge for ordinary Malaysians is to be discerning enough to not fall prey to religious or ethnic posturing, or be swayed by loose promises and ill-founded stories,” said Raja Nazrin in a lecture titled “The Challenges of Governance in Contemporary Malaysia”.
He acknowledged that public scrutiny is needed to help ensure good governance, but said some criticisms appeared intended to discredit government institutions.
ReplyDelete“Unfortunately, there also appears to be a tendency among some quarters to criticise and condemn without sufficient basis, to exaggerate and falsify information, and to deliberately undermine the credibility of institutions,” he said.
ReplyDeleteHe said that “the gullible and the disenchanted become easy prey” to such information on the Internet.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteHe cautioned that by circulating this manner of material, the public may unwittingly “destroy” the institutions needed for the smooth running of the government.
ReplyDeleteRaja Nazrin also said there must be “restraints on the arbitrary exercise” of public officials’ powers to ensure that their “positions of trust and responsibility are not used for private gain and that the national interest, and not special interests, is always served.”
ReplyDelete“The importance of transparency and a zero tolerance towards corruption cannot be emphasised enough.”
He noted that another challenge facing Malaysia is managing an “increasingly polarised society” in a climate of weakened national unity.
ReplyDeleteHe said “opposing points of view have hardened and become more entrenched”, and lacked the “spirit of accommodation”.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete“Demands have become more vocal... framed in ever more aggressive and confrontational terms, and sometimes even accompanied by acts of violence.”
ReplyDeleteHe also said the government’s legislative reforms had brought the “laws on civil liberties and national security up-to-date, making them more compatible with international norms.”
In anticipation of the upcoming general election, we have seen the Opposition trying to introduce more policy proposals to sway key voting segments. In particular, it has targeted young, first-time voters, who make up the bulk of the more than two million newly registered Malaysian voters, and the middle class in general.
ReplyDeleteTwo of Pakatan’s policy proposals announced this year are designed to strike at these two voter demographics directly. The first was a promise to write off all National Higher Education Fund (PTPTN) loans and provide free university education, and the latest, a policy that will see a reduction in passenger car prices.
ReplyDeleteBoth policies have clear political objectives in mind. The student loan write-off is an attractive promise for young voters still stuck with their PTPTN debt in addition to dealing with higher living costs. The promise of lower car prices casts a wider appeal as most Malaysian car owners bemoan having to pay more for the same car than people in other countries, which results in a bigger chunk of the salary being used to service their monthly car loans.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteBy selling these promises, the federal opposition is saying that it can assist with increasing your disposable income because you will have more to spend on other things and also save because these two expenditure items will either disappear (PTPTN loans written off) or be reduced (cheaper car prices).
The purpose of this article is not to examine the two proposals directly but to discuss one fundamental question that arises when political parties – especially those not in power – make electoral promises: How do they hope to pay for these promises?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteIf this question does not require answering, then politics would be an easy game. Promise people everything under the sun, sit back and enjoy watching voters swing your way. But we do not live in a world where the electorate believes they can get everything for free. Politicians cannot assume people are stupid, as they seem to do particularly when elections are approaching.
ReplyDeleteApart from subsidies which many Malaysians still hold dear, most Malaysians do generally believe that the government should not increase the budget deficit and borrow more money. Most Malaysians also feel a sense of responsibility and that people should pay back whatever they borrowed and not have the government write off those loans.
ReplyDeleteAlso, importantly, international investors and credit rating agencies are watching to see whether we live within our means. In an age of sovereign defaults and bailouts, fiscal responsibility is a key measure of sound public administration that will have an impact on our attractiveness as an investment destination and on our credit ratings.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the federal opposition is concerned, it is doubtful that balancing he books high on its agenda. It has not really explained how it is going to pay for its electoral promises. And just to put it on the record once again – its electoral promises amount to a very very high RM206.5 billion in the first year alone. And this doesn’t even include Pakatan’s standard promise of an immediate reduction in the price of petrol should it take over the Government. Depending on the reduction, this could cost billions on top of whatever has already been promised.
ReplyDeleteLet’s just put the cost of the opposition’s promises into context. The federal government development budget for 2012 was RM51.2 billion. Pakatan’s electoral promises costs 400% or 4 times more than the current 2012 Government’s development budget. So if it were to fulfil its promises in the first year of office, a Pakatan federal Government would not have enough money to pay the salaries of teachers, doctors, nurses, police and army personnel, let alone have the funds for building roads, schools, hospitals or providing welfare assistance to the poor. Most of the money would have been used to deliver on its Jingga promises.
If this happens, essential services would grind to a halt and the country would cease to function.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteIf it decides to borrow more money to fund its promises and keep the government going, the fiscal deficit would balloon from 4.7%, which it is now, to more than 25% of GDP and Malaysia would effectively be bankrupt within the first two years of Pakatan ruling Putrajaya.
Pakatan’s standard response to this is that it will “get rid of the corruption” to pay for its promises. But the question is can getting rid of corruption pay for the Oppositions RM206.5 billion Ringgit promises?
ReplyDeleteLet’s analyse the 2012 federal budget. Of the total RM232.8 billion that was originally budgeted, RM148.5 billion (63.8% of the total budget) was reserved for salaries of civil servants as well as fixed charges and grants such as subsidies, servicing debt, scholarships, research grants and funds for state governments. These are all fixed charges or payments. That leaves RM84.3 billion procurement – related spending, whether it is purchasing supplies, services and assets or paying for projects under development expenditure.
ReplyDeleteSince corruption and leakages can only occur for procurement related expenditure as opposed to fixed charges like salaries, any savings can only be made from this portion of the budget. If you get 10% savings from procurement, that would be just RM8.43 billion extra – hardly enough to pay for the opposition’s election promises. Even the entire sum related to procurement expenditure – RM 84.3 billion – is short of the RM206.5 billion needed to pay for its promises to Putrajaya.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThe key point is this: It is easy to say savings can be made by reducing leakages, but nobody really asks how much you can save. While 10% of procurement – related items can yield a significant figure as explained above, it is not so significant when measured against Pakatan’s multi-billion Ringgit promises that cost so much more to fulfill.
So, it is not enough for the federal opposition to say it can save by getting rid of corruption. Let’s assume that Pakatan can get rid of corruption 100% and that it will avoid the corruption scandals it has got itself into in Selangor at the Federal level. This is still not enough to pay for its pledges. It has to tell Malaysians how else it will raise the money. Will it borrow more? What programs will it cancel? Which schools will it not build? Which hospitals will to close? What taxes will go up? How many civil servants will it fire?
ReplyDeleteUnless the opposition can answer these hard questions can explain how it will raise the money to fulfill its promises, we can safely assume that either it will drive Malaysia to ruin by spending what we don’t have or, in fact, it has no intention whatsoever of fulfilling its promises because it knows it simply can’t pay for them
ReplyDelete